According to Wikimedia Foundation's Jay Walsh, the hope is to redress under-represented contributions from Arabic, Portuguese, and Indic-language versions of the site. A goal of the project is to allow both the former wiki markup editing and editing with the WYSIWYG VisualEditor. It was part of a $1m project aimed at developing new features and making improvements. It was hoped this would reduce the technical hurdle for would-be Wikipedians, enabling wider participation in editing, and was an attempt to reverse the decline in editor numbers of 50,000 in 2006 to 35,000 in 2011, having peaked in 2007. A WYSIWYG editor for Wikipedia had been planned for years in order to remove the need to learn the wiki markup language. The original web-based Wikipedia editor provided by MediaWiki is a plain browser-based text editor, also called 'Source editor', where authors have to learn the wiki markup language to edit. In a presentation from Wikimania 2013, the team developing the software presented it to attendees A 2015 study by the Wikimedia Foundation found that VisualEditor failed to provide the anticipated benefits for new editors. In September 2013, English Wikipedia's VisualEditor was changed from opt-out to opt-in, following user complaints, but it was returned to being available by default (for new registered users only) in October 2015 after further development. According to The Daily Dot, Wikimedia Foundation's pursuit of wider participation may risk alienating existing editors. The Wikimedia Foundation considered it the most challenging technical project to date, while The Economist has called it Wikipedia's "most significant change". In July 2013, it was enabled by default on several of the largest Wikipedia projects. It was developed by the Wikimedia Foundation in partnership with Fandom. With a large customer base consisting of some of the leading brands like Zoho Corporation, Adobe, Acer, Nissan, and many more, ProProfs Knowledge Base is making a mark in the global business landscape.VisualEditor ( VE) is an online rich-text editor for MediaWiki-powered wikis that provides a direct visual way to edit pages based on the "what you see is what you get" principle. Besides, it can even be used in combination with sibling software - ProProfs Chat and Help Desk to make the experience even more enriching. Another fascinating feature of ProProfs Knowledge Base is it's incredibly powerful integrations with leading tools like Zendesk, Freshdesk, Wufoo, Google Analytics, and many more. The software is noted for its robust reporting system, Google-like search mechanism, and a wide array of branding and customization options. An all-in-one wiki tool, ProProfs Knowledge Base equips businesses with all the essential features they need to manage and maintain their company knowledge. This tool can be used by people of all skill levels - technical experts as well as beginners to write, edit, customize, and manage a company wiki. What is Wiki Software?Įase of use and compelling features are the hallmarks of the wiki software offered by ProProfs. Therefore, we have compiled a list of the best wiki software to help you make the right choice. With a slew of options available online, picking one wiki tool can be challenging. ![]() You need a powerful tool with rich features that assists you in the process. You can’t build an online wiki all on your own. If you are thinking of creating a company-wide wiki but don’t know where to start, here’s what you need to know. That would make employee training, knowledge sharing, and collaboration a breeze. Imagine if you had something similar in your organization - a centralized wiki that acts as your company’s encyclopedia containing critical information about your policies, projects, offerings, and much more. Wikipedia’s increasing popularity can be attributed to its multilingual and collaborative nature, where people across the globe can find reliable information in a moment. The amount of content Wikipedia has is jaw-dropping - 17 million articles in 262 languages, to be precise.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |